为什么两个模板函数的输出不同?

为什么这两个模板函数 FuncOne 和 FuncTwo 输出不同?

template <class T>
T * FuncOne(T & v)
{
    auto a = reinterpret_cast<const volatile char &>(v);
    auto b = & const_cast<char&>(a);
    auto c = reinterpret_cast<T *>(b);
    return c;    
}

template <class T>
T * FuncTwo(T & v)
{
    return reinterpret_cast<T *>(& const_cast<char&> (reinterpret_cast<const volatile char &>(v)));
}

测试这两个功能的代码:

int main()
{       
  nonaddressable na;
  nonaddressable * naptr = FuncOne(na); 
  cout << "FuncOne: naptr = " << naptr << endl;
  naptr = FuncTwo(na); 
  cout << "FuncTwo: naptr = " << naptr << endl;

  nonaddressable * nbptr = new nonaddressable;
  cout << "Address of nbptr = " << nbptr << endl;  
  cout << "FuncOne: nbptr = " << FuncOne(*nbptr) << endl; 
  cout << "FuncTwo: nbptr = " << FuncTwo(*nbptr) << endl;
}

样本输出:

FuncOne: naptr = 0x61fddf   
FuncTwo: naptr = 0x61fe2f   

Address of nbptr = 0x7216e0   
FuncOne: nbptr = 0x61fddf   
FuncTwo: nbptr = 0x7216e0 

从比较 nbptr , 函数二 给出预期和正确的输出。但为什么不 函数子 输出与另一种写作方式相同 函数二 ?

使用的编译器:g++7.1.0