如何在Alloy中构建递归谓词/函数

我试图在Alloy中生成两组类,例如,重构之前的类 重构应用程序后的应用程序和类。 假设在第一个集合中,我们有以下类:

ALeft -> BLeft -> CLeft    
                  Class1
                  Class2 -> Class3
                         -> Class4

意味着ALeft是BLeft的父级,而BLeft又是CLeft、Class1和 Class2,它又是Class3和Class4的父级。

另一方面,根据相同的推理,我们在第二组中 以下类别组:

ARight -> BRight -> CRight
                    Class1'
                    Class2' -> Class3'
                            -> Class4'

由于每组代表 相同的类别,但按不同的时间顺序(不同的状态),必须保证相应的 等价物,例如Class1和Class1'是等价的,这意味着它们具有相同的字段、方法等(考虑到重构只发生 对于相同的推理,Class2和Class2’、Class3和Class3’、Class4和Class4’也是等效的。此外,我们应该在Left和Right类中的方法之间具有等价性。例如,如果我们有一个Left类方法,比如:

public int leftClassMethod(){
    new ALeft().other();
}

然后,必须有相应的Right类方法,如:

public int rightClassMethod(){
    new ARight().other();
}

正如Loic(在这个讨论列表中)所建议的,这些类的等价性开始得到保证,但我们必须补充下面的谓词类AreTheSame,以便也保证它们方法的等价性。考虑以下模型:

abstract sig Id {}

sig ClassId, MethodId,FieldId extends Id {}

one sig public, private_, protected extends Accessibility {}

abstract sig Type {}

abstract sig PrimitiveType extends Type {}

one sig Long_, Int_ extends PrimitiveType {}

sig Class extends Type {
    id: one ClassId,
    extend: lone Class,
    methods: set Method,
    fields: set Field,
}

sig Method {
    id : one MethodId,
    param: lone Type,
    return: one Type,
    acc: lone Accessibility,
    b: one Block
}

sig Block {
    statements: one SequentialComposition
}

sig SequentialComposition {
    first: one StatementExpression,
    rest: lone SequentialComposition
}

abstract sig Expression {}
abstract sig StatementExpression extends Expression {}

sig MethodInvocation extends StatementExpression{
    pExp: lone PrimaryExpression, 
    id_methodInvoked: one Method
}

sig AssignmentExpression extends StatementExpression {
    pExpressionLeft: one FieldAccess,
    pExpressionRight: one {Expression - newCreator - VoidMethodInvocation - PrimaryExpression - AssignmentExpression }
}

abstract sig PrimaryExpression extends Expression {}

sig this_, super_ extends PrimaryExpression {}

sig newCreator extends PrimaryExpression {
    id_cf : one Class
}

sig FieldAccess {
    pExp: one PrimaryExpression,
    id_fieldInvoked: one Field
}

sig Left,Right extends Class{}

one sig ARight, BRight, CRight extends Right{}

one sig ALeft, BLeft, CLeft extends Left{}

pred law6RightToLeft[] {
    twoClassesDeclarationInHierarchy[]
}

pred twoClassesDeclarationInHierarchy[] {
     no disj x,y:Right | x.id=y.id
     Right.*extend & Left.*extend=none
     one r: Right | r.extend= none
     one l:Left| l.extend=none

     ARight.extend=none
     ALeft.extend=none
     BRight in CRight.extend
     BLeft in CLeft.extend
     ARight in BRight.extend
     ALeft in BLeft.extend
     #(extend.BRight) > 2
     #(extend.BLeft) > 2
     #(extend.ARight) = 1
     #(extend.ALeft) = 1
     CLeft.id=CRight.id

     all m:Method | m in ((*extend).ALeft).methods => m !in ((*extend).ARight).methods
     all m:Method | m in ((*extend).ARight).methods => m !in ((*extend).ALeft).methods
     some Method
     all r:Right | all l:Left|  (r.extend= none and l.extend=none) implies classesAreTheSameAndSoAreTheirCorrespondingSons[r,l]
}

pred classesAreTheSameAndSoAreTheirCorrespondingSons[right,left: Class]{
    classesAreTheSame[right,left]
    all r: right.^~extend | one l :left.^~extend | classesAreTheSame[r,l] and classesAreTheSame[r.extend ,l.extend]
    all l:left.^~extend | one r :right.^~extend | classesAreTheSame[r,l] and  classesAreTheSame[r.extend ,l.extend]
}

pred classesAreTheSame[r,l: Class]{
    r.id=l.id
    r.fields=l.fields

    #r.methods = #l.methods
    all mr: r.methods | one ml: l.methods | mr.id = ml.id && mr.b != ml.b 
    all mr: l.methods | one ml: r.methods | mr.id = ml.id && mr.b != ml.b 

    all r1: r.methods, r2: l.methods | r1.id = r2.id => 
        equalsSeqComposition[r1.b.statements, r2.b.statements]
}

pred equalsSeqComposition[sc1, sc2: SequentialComposition]{
    equalsStatementExpression[sc1.first, sc2.first] 
    //#sc1.(*rest) = #sc2.(*rest)
}

pred equalsStatementExpression [s1, s2: StatementExpression]{
    s1 in AssignmentExpression => (s2 in AssignmentExpression && equalsAssignment[s1, s2])
    s1 in MethodInvocation => (s2 in MethodInvocation && equalsMethodInvocation[s1, s2])
    s1 in VoidMethodInvocation => (s2 in VoidMethodInvocation && equalsVoidMethodInvocation[s1, s2])
}

pred equalsAssignment [ae, ae2:AssignmentExpression]{
    equalsPrimaryExpression[(ae.pExpressionLeft).pExp, (ae2.pExpressionLeft).pExp]
    equalsPExpressionRight[ae.pExpressionRight, ae2.pExpressionRight]
}

pred equalsPrimaryExpression[p1, p2:PrimaryExpression]{
    p1 in newCreator  => p2 in newCreator && equalsClassesId [p1.id_cf, p2.id_cf]
    p1 in this_ => p2 in this_ 
    p1 in super_ => p2 in super_
}

pred equalsPExpressionRight[e1, e2:Expression]{
    e1 in LiteralValue => e2 in LiteralValue 
    e1 in MethodInvocation => e2 in MethodInvocation && equalsMethodInvocation[e1, e2]
}

pred equalsMethodInvocation[m1, m2:MethodInvocation]{
    equalsPrimaryExpression[m1.pExp, m2.pExp]
    m1.id_methodInvoked.id = m2.id_methodInvoked.id 
    m1.param = m2.param
}

pred equalsVoidMethodInvocation[m1, m2:VoidMethodInvocation]{
    equalsPrimaryExpression[m1.pExp, m2.pExp]
    m1.id_voidMethodInvoked.id = m2.id_voidMethodInvoked.id
    m1.param = m2.param
}

run law6RightToLeft for 10 but 17 Id, 17 Type, 17 Class

我的想法是通过它们的id来识别相应的方法(leftClassMethod()和rightClassMethod(())(根据模型,这是保证相同的)。然而,谓词equalsSeqComposition不起作用,当我尝试将签名SequentialComposition的其余关系包括在比较中时,情况会变得更糟(上面在谓词equalSeqComposition中进行了评论)。最后一个比较更加困难,因为Alloy不允许递归,并且当您使用传递闭包时,会丢失与排序相同的继承级别。知道我怎么用Alloy来表示这个吗?