理论上,可以在K8S(或任何其他)提供者中引用来自GCP提供者的资源,就像在单个提供者的上下文中引用资源或数据源一样。
provider "google" {
region = "us-west1"
}
data "google_compute_zones" "available" {}
resource "google_container_cluster" "primary" {
name = "the-only-marcellus-wallace"
zone = "${data.google_compute_zones.available.names[0]}"
initial_node_count = 3
additional_zones = [
"${data.google_compute_zones.available.names[1]}"
]
master_auth {
username = "mr.yoda"
password = "adoy.rm"
}
node_config {
oauth_scopes = [
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/compute",
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/devstorage.read_only",
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/logging.write",
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/monitoring"
]
}
}
provider "kubernetes" {
host = "https://${google_container_cluster.primary.endpoint}"
username = "${google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.username}"
password = "${google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.password}"
client_certificate = "${base64decode(google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.client_certificate)}"
client_key = "${base64decode(google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.client_key)}"
cluster_ca_certificate = "${base64decode(google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.cluster_ca_certificate)}"
}
resource "kubernetes_namespace" "n" {
metadata {
name = "blablah"
}
}
然而,在实践中,由于已知的核心bug破坏了跨提供程序依赖关系,它可能无法按预期工作,请参阅
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/12393
和
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/4149
分别地
替代解决方案是:
-
使用两阶段应用和
target
首先是GKE集群,然后是依赖于它的任何其他集群,即。
terraform apply -target=google_container_cluster.primary
然后
terraform apply
-
将GKE集群配置与K8S配置分开,为它们提供完全隔离的工作流,并通过
remote state
。
/terraform-gke/main.tf
terraform {
backend "gcs" {
bucket = "tf-state-prod"
prefix = "terraform/state"
}
}
provider "google" {
region = "us-west1"
}
data "google_compute_zones" "available" {}
resource "google_container_cluster" "primary" {
name = "the-only-marcellus-wallace"
zone = "${data.google_compute_zones.available.names[0]}"
initial_node_count = 3
additional_zones = [
"${data.google_compute_zones.available.names[1]}"
]
master_auth {
username = "mr.yoda"
password = "adoy.rm"
}
node_config {
oauth_scopes = [
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/compute",
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/devstorage.read_only",
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/logging.write",
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/monitoring"
]
}
}
output "gke_host" {
value = "https://${google_container_cluster.primary.endpoint}"
}
output "gke_username" {
value = "${google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.username}"
}
output "gke_password" {
value = "${google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.password}"
}
output "gke_client_certificate" {
value = "${base64decode(google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.client_certificate)}"
}
output "gke_client_key" {
value = "${base64decode(google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.client_key)}"
}
output "gke_cluster_ca_certificate" {
value = "${base64decode(google_container_cluster.primary.master_auth.0.cluster_ca_certificate)}"
}
在这里,我们通过以下方式公开所有必要的配置
output
并使用后端将状态以及这些输出存储在远程位置,
GCS
在这种情况下。这使我们能够在下面的配置中引用它。
/terraform-k8s/main.tf
data "terraform_remote_state" "foo" {
backend = "gcs"
config {
bucket = "tf-state-prod"
prefix = "terraform/state"
}
}
provider "kubernetes" {
host = "https://${data.terraform_remote_state.foo.gke_host}"
username = "${data.terraform_remote_state.foo.gke_username}"
password = "${data.terraform_remote_state.foo.gke_password}"
client_certificate = "${base64decode(data.terraform_remote_state.foo.gke_client_certificate)}"
client_key = "${base64decode(data.terraform_remote_state.foo.gke_client_key)}"
cluster_ca_certificate = "${base64decode(data.terraform_remote_state.foo.gke_cluster_ca_certificate)}"
}
resource "kubernetes_namespace" "n" {
metadata {
name = "blablah"
}
}
这里可能很明显也可能不明显的是,在创建/更新任何K8S资源之前,必须创建/更新集群(如果此类更新依赖于集群的更新)。
无论哪种方式,采取第二种方法通常都是可取的(即使bug不是一个因素,跨提供者引用也有效),因为它减少了爆炸半径,并定义了更明确的责任。这种部署通常有一个人/团队负责管理集群,另一个人/团队负责管理K8S资源。
当然也可能有重叠-例如,希望部署日志记录和;在新的GKE集群上监控基础设施,因此跨提供者依赖关系旨在满足此类用例。因此,我建议订阅上述GH问题。